Jim Hlavac
I have always believed that complex subjects are better
understood when broken down into smaller elements. The Economic
Realm is no different. What I've endeavored to do here on these
pages is present every single aspect of the subject in bite sized
sections. These things are a lot easier explained when each part is
considered separately. Once one understands the parts, the whole
becomes much more comprehensible. It is also true that I think a little
differently on all these subjects than most other people. For every
subject there comes a time when a new way of thinking about it
becomes necessary. We are in the time for search for some different
explanation of what we see around us, and we crave a better set of
solutions; workable, practical solutions. We have been living in the
vortex of the Socialist Era since the 1850s. Before that was Royalty and
Theology. Unfortunately, Marx, who invented the Socialist Era, did not
create anything new. What he did was apply new names to old
phenomena and those phenomena continued. There was no great
change in world political affairs in Marx's time to allow him to create
some new theory of governance. But he did want to be the governor,
and so he put new words to the old phenomena, most likely in the
hope of selling more books. And oddly, he was miffed that the
Communist Manifesto did not earn him the money he thought it should.
For a man who claimed to be all about sharing the wealth, he was
decidedly capitalistic in his desire for the profits from his work. That
alone should clue anyone in to the falseness of his ideas. For when the
propagator of an idea will not adhere to his own ideas than those ideas
must be suspect, for the originator and propagator obviously does not
believe what he is proposing.
Yet, his new words were very popular and so supposedly were
implemented to various degrees, and despite all evidence of complete
failure we are often told "well, the theory is good, but there's people
preventing it from being put into practice." Which is, of course,
exactly what Marx said there would be -- lingering capitalism
preventing the triumph of socialism and the nirvana of communism.
Which of course led to the impoverishment, killing, torturing and
imprisoning of millions of people for their own good. They were
enemies against themselves, for while they were the people, they
were against the people. While they were living in history they were
said to be against history. While they were doing what they good
according to their ability, and using what they thought they needed,
they were derided for not being for the nirvanna of someone else
determining what your ability was and what your needs were. And
that's the fallacy of socialism, and all the other isms of the world, of
which Liberty does not have an ism. Which, too, should be a clue that
it is not equal to the isms of this world.
Meanwhile, alone among nations, the United States of America
has achieved an astounding wonder which people from around the
world want to join. Either on these shores, or in their home lands,
the people of the world have embraced the universal ideals of
America. It is their governments which have worked diligently to
prevent the implementation of what they can readily observe works.
The reason is simple -- they would have to give up their royalist ideas,
their theological beliefs and their Marxist economic, social and
political thoughts. That these three are really the same is not readily
apparent.
The entire thrust of what I write here is to show how these
three are the age old means for the repression of mankind. Yet, the
trend is towards the universal truths as expressed in America's founding
documents and ideals. Oddly, too, however, America has been moving
towards the failed ideals of the old world, and with each step in that
direction America weakens itself. That weakening, too, is evident. It
will probably continue on a while longer, but within our life times it
will come to a screeching halt because of the internal discord that
Marx's ideas bring.
So I propose a way out of the dilemma by first changing the mind
set, and then getting back to the basics of the universal ideal of life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness which leads to great wealth and
civic harmony.
Clicking on any of the links to the right or left will bring you to
portion of the political and economic realm which must be considered
for anyone to understand the enormity of it all. Rarely are all the
elements involved put together in one place. I felt compelled to do so,
with the forlorn hope that it will eventually be read by millions. Only
then can royalty, theology and Marxism be cast into the garbage can
and a new world wide era of peace and prosperity reign. People every
where want it as is clearly evident by their behavior of doing what
they can to avoid the tax man, the regulator and the bureaucrat, and
to seek new ways around the age old dilemma of the lunatics of power
who seek always to control and never to allow individuals the right to
do what they want to do cooperatively with other individuals.
understood when broken down into smaller elements. The Economic
Realm is no different. What I've endeavored to do here on these
pages is present every single aspect of the subject in bite sized
sections. These things are a lot easier explained when each part is
considered separately. Once one understands the parts, the whole
becomes much more comprehensible. It is also true that I think a little
differently on all these subjects than most other people. For every
subject there comes a time when a new way of thinking about it
becomes necessary. We are in the time for search for some different
explanation of what we see around us, and we crave a better set of
solutions; workable, practical solutions. We have been living in the
vortex of the Socialist Era since the 1850s. Before that was Royalty and
Theology. Unfortunately, Marx, who invented the Socialist Era, did not
create anything new. What he did was apply new names to old
phenomena and those phenomena continued. There was no great
change in world political affairs in Marx's time to allow him to create
some new theory of governance. But he did want to be the governor,
and so he put new words to the old phenomena, most likely in the
hope of selling more books. And oddly, he was miffed that the
Communist Manifesto did not earn him the money he thought it should.
For a man who claimed to be all about sharing the wealth, he was
decidedly capitalistic in his desire for the profits from his work. That
alone should clue anyone in to the falseness of his ideas. For when the
propagator of an idea will not adhere to his own ideas than those ideas
must be suspect, for the originator and propagator obviously does not
believe what he is proposing.
Yet, his new words were very popular and so supposedly were
implemented to various degrees, and despite all evidence of complete
failure we are often told "well, the theory is good, but there's people
preventing it from being put into practice." Which is, of course,
exactly what Marx said there would be -- lingering capitalism
preventing the triumph of socialism and the nirvana of communism.
Which of course led to the impoverishment, killing, torturing and
imprisoning of millions of people for their own good. They were
enemies against themselves, for while they were the people, they
were against the people. While they were living in history they were
said to be against history. While they were doing what they good
according to their ability, and using what they thought they needed,
they were derided for not being for the nirvanna of someone else
determining what your ability was and what your needs were. And
that's the fallacy of socialism, and all the other isms of the world, of
which Liberty does not have an ism. Which, too, should be a clue that
it is not equal to the isms of this world.
Meanwhile, alone among nations, the United States of America
has achieved an astounding wonder which people from around the
world want to join. Either on these shores, or in their home lands,
the people of the world have embraced the universal ideals of
America. It is their governments which have worked diligently to
prevent the implementation of what they can readily observe works.
The reason is simple -- they would have to give up their royalist ideas,
their theological beliefs and their Marxist economic, social and
political thoughts. That these three are really the same is not readily
apparent.
The entire thrust of what I write here is to show how these
three are the age old means for the repression of mankind. Yet, the
trend is towards the universal truths as expressed in America's founding
documents and ideals. Oddly, too, however, America has been moving
towards the failed ideals of the old world, and with each step in that
direction America weakens itself. That weakening, too, is evident. It
will probably continue on a while longer, but within our life times it
will come to a screeching halt because of the internal discord that
Marx's ideas bring.
So I propose a way out of the dilemma by first changing the mind
set, and then getting back to the basics of the universal ideal of life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness which leads to great wealth and
civic harmony.
Clicking on any of the links to the right or left will bring you to
portion of the political and economic realm which must be considered
for anyone to understand the enormity of it all. Rarely are all the
elements involved put together in one place. I felt compelled to do so,
with the forlorn hope that it will eventually be read by millions. Only
then can royalty, theology and Marxism be cast into the garbage can
and a new world wide era of peace and prosperity reign. People every
where want it as is clearly evident by their behavior of doing what
they can to avoid the tax man, the regulator and the bureaucrat, and
to seek new ways around the age old dilemma of the lunatics of power
who seek always to control and never to allow individuals the right to
do what they want to do cooperatively with other individuals.
| Politics Home The Practicalist The Socialist Era Politics Re-Explained Fundamentals Domestic Affairs Economic Theory Foreign Affairs Libertarian Ideas Political Theory Philosophy Royalty & Theology |
Economic Theory
| Economic Theory |