Jim Hlavac
Foreign Affairs
Current Foreign Policy
Past foreign policy
Which agencies are
involved in foreign affairs
The US Military
Why pick on some
countries and not others?
Future foreign policy goals
Future foreign policy missions
Future foreign policy theory
Future foreign policy practice
The United Nations
IMF and World Bank
History and its affect on current
foreign policy
understanding history
American Foreign Aid
The difficulties of doing
things that need doing.
Singling out countries
for active intervention
Free trade and why other
countries haven't benefited as
much as they could have -- their
domestic situation
How America made
Europe what it is today
Complaints by other countries
about America
Why America must
always be involved
Globalization
An analysis of each continent,
virtually country by country
Mexico
The Carribean
South America
Central America
Sub-Saharan Africa
Northern Africa
Southern Africa
The Middle East
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
Scandanavia
Russia
The Asian
Subcontinent(southasia)
india
Asia
China
Taiwan
Polynesia
Australia
Japan
Pakistan and india
When they all catch
up to Europe
Aspiring to be America
Because Europe is
half of America
Adopt a country
almost failed states
american occupation
changing cultures
cultural dictatorships
demilitarization
diplomacy
electing dictators
empires
failed states
federal isreal-palestine
freedom for others
good and bad dictators
intelligence agencies
marxism & catholicism
negative culture
oil and war
peacekeeping
peaceniks
positive culture
raising other nations
relations with others
successful states
temporary dictatorships
trade
trading blocs
The CIA
the wealth of other nations
US is not an empire
ethnic cleansing
Foreign Affairs
Sections
Nearly every single right and liberty that exists in these countries is the direct
result of intervention by the USA in the years following WWII.  And the liberties
now being pursued by Eastern Europe are predicated and modeled up on those
of the US.  
      The vast majority of politicians in Europe and Japans are socialist and statist
who believe that people are given rights as a privilege by the state.  Instead of
the state being a creature of the very people as individuals.
      The ownership of major sectors of the economy by the state is part and
parcel of the socialist statist mentality and thus people are kept that much poorer
for it.  It is this statist belief that allowed Europe to blithely sit by and watch the
government of Serbia to slaughter thousands and destroy Sarajevo and bring
unending grief to the Yugoslavs, because the statist politicians believed

A) that the state, as representative of the culture and the people, had the right to
do so;
B) the individuals were merely pawns of the state, expendable for the greater
cultural good and the continued existence of the state over the people;
C) the racism, ethnicism of Serbians is not in fact very much different then that of
the rest of Europe;

      A continent where killing and repression because of religion and ethnicity
and race is still widely practiced, however muted because of the pressure
brought by the United States and the presence of our military, hardly has the
right to lecture the United States on Freedom and Prosperity for all the peoples
of the world