Jim Hlavac
Foreign Affairs
Current Foreign Policy
Past foreign policy
Which agencies are
involved in foreign affairs
The US Military
Why pick on some
countries and not others?
Future foreign policy goals
Future foreign policy missions
Future foreign policy theory
Future foreign policy practice
The United Nations
IMF and World Bank
History and its affect on current
foreign policy
understanding history
American Foreign Aid
The difficulties of doing
things that need doing.
Singling out countries
for active intervention
Free trade and why other
countries haven't benefited as
much as they could have -- their
domestic situation
How America made
Europe what it is today
Complaints by other countries
about America
Why America must
always be involved
Globalization
An analysis of each continent,
virtually country by country
Mexico
The Carribean
South America
Central America
Sub-Saharan Africa
Northern Africa
Southern Africa
The Middle East
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
Scandanavia
Russia
The Asian
Subcontinent(southasia)
india
Asia
China
Taiwan
Polynesia
Australia
Japan
Pakistan and india
When they all catch
up to Europe
Aspiring to be America
Because Europe is
half of America
Adopt a country
almost failed states
american occupation
changing cultures
cultural dictatorships
demilitarization
diplomacy
electing dictators
empires
failed states
federal isreal-palestine
freedom for others
good and bad dictators
intelligence agencies
marxism & catholicism
negative culture
oil and war
peacekeeping
peaceniks
positive culture
raising other nations
relations with others
successful states
temporary dictatorships
trade
trading blocs
The CIA
the wealth of other nations
US is not an empire
ethnic cleansing
Foreign Affairs
Sections
How could anyone ever think that Africans, Asians, South Americans and Arabs
are incapable of running their own lives?  And how can anyone sit idly by - as
Europe did, while Serbians wrecked havoc on their major cities and small towns,
for some cultural glory?  That culture is absurd, even disgusting.  These
cultures are abominations.
      At the first chance at liberty people everywhere have lunged into economic,
religious,  political and cultural freedom.  In Thailand, in Japan, in India, in China
and South Korea, when the shackles of repression have been torn off the
people engage in constructive and productive enterprises.  The more the
shackles are loosened the more prosperous and free and reasonable the
people become; as fast as is humanly possible.  Look at China's turn towards
reasonableness and freedom -- a huge up swell in the wealth generated by the
people.  The more freedom the more prosperity.
      But it is the Marxists' statist beliefs of Europeans and Japan that declare
that free people making free choices to pursue their own endeavors is somehow
bad for the good of these cultures.  The cultures are only good when the people
are repressed?  It is morally repugnant to even listen to the argument.  Of
course, they don't say it so bluntly, they are politically correct; they use terms
like, "well, that's their culture, we must respect their ways, that's the way it's
always been, they can't change."
      The world's leftists and liberals and communists and socialists blame
America for the poverty and repression of thousands of year's old cultures, and
then blame American for trying to step in and solve the problems.
      The Europeans and Japanese instead want to hobble America with the
same misguided and miscreant policies and beliefs which prevent their own
people form flourishing and enjoying the fruits of liberty as we Americans have
them.  Further, they want the American people to work harder, to give their
bounty to the rest of the world -- as a reward for their own failure.