| Fundamentals |
| Politics Home The Practicalist The Socialist Era Politics Re-Explained Fundamentals Domestic Affairs Economic Theory Foreign Affairs Libertarian Ideas Political Theory Philosophy Royalty & Theology |
| Jim Hlavac |
| Fundamentals Sections |
Royalty
Since the dawn of time, and with few and recent exceptions, governments have come
from royalty
The power of royalty has been steadily if slowly eroding
Royalty always tries to align itself with divine rights, historical inevitability and or
mysticism and religious fervor
In recent times royalty has assumed democratic names, in an attempt to hide president;
supreme ruler, people's guardian, commisar, chancellor and many others
What Karl Marx called capitalism was based on, and is, an explanation of landed
aristocracy, royalty, nobility of England and Europe
Royalty, nobility, first families, are all part of one system
Royalty will always try to devolve future power to blood relatives, often measured in
extreme degrees
The set up of a new royalist regime or dynasty is always with capricious individual
violence, once established only a bona fide eldest son is assured of peaceful accession
to power
Royalty always has no limit on the service in office
Royalty always accrues title to land, resources and wealth to the smallest number of
people, who maintain that title for as long as possible with violence
The more absolute the royalty the less adherence on any written laws
Civil law is based on royalty granting privileges and so called rights to subjects --
common law is based on limited the claimed prerogative of royal sovereignty
Since the dawn of time, and with few and recent exceptions, governments have come
from royalty
The power of royalty has been steadily if slowly eroding
Royalty always tries to align itself with divine rights, historical inevitability and or
mysticism and religious fervor
In recent times royalty has assumed democratic names, in an attempt to hide president;
supreme ruler, people's guardian, commisar, chancellor and many others
What Karl Marx called capitalism was based on, and is, an explanation of landed
aristocracy, royalty, nobility of England and Europe
Royalty, nobility, first families, are all part of one system
Royalty will always try to devolve future power to blood relatives, often measured in
extreme degrees
The set up of a new royalist regime or dynasty is always with capricious individual
violence, once established only a bona fide eldest son is assured of peaceful accession
to power
Royalty always has no limit on the service in office
Royalty always accrues title to land, resources and wealth to the smallest number of
people, who maintain that title for as long as possible with violence
The more absolute the royalty the less adherence on any written laws
Civil law is based on royalty granting privileges and so called rights to subjects --
common law is based on limited the claimed prerogative of royal sovereignty