| To a Star Trek Future |
If you watch the TV show Star Trek you will see that there is total information available,
and yet total privacy and respect. That is the goal many Americans, and like minded
people around the world are striving for. It is the ultimate, if unstated goal. It is hard,
actually, to be serious while claiming that the fantasy world of a TV sci-fi show is your
goal, and yet Star Trek is the best example of a world vision where peace and harmony
and prosperity exist.
The problems of the world seem intractable, but in fact, a fixed time can be applied to
efforts to lift every country out of poverty. People in rich countries who are worried what
will happen when all the world is rich are really just calling for the continuing poverty of
the rest of the world because they are blinded to the great propensity of humans to
solve all problems. People and States who call for the glorification of specific leaders,
states, languages, cultures, political parties or religions are in fact statists, no matter what
their name for themselves is. They believe that the collective has a right above and
beyond the individual and that individualism itself is detrimental to the survival of the
glorified entity.
Each country and region has separate problems and thus the practical steps at
implementing changes will differ in each. However, development comes at the "cost" of
the elimination of many features of the world's cultures. In strict Muslim cultures there will
always be a lack of jobs and wealth because all of the things which generate jobs and
wealth are prohibited.
If everyone wears the same outfit there is no fashion or model industry. Less retail
becomes less warehouses, less shipping, less packaging, less everything that people could
be gainfully employed at. The diversity of fashion is one way that jobs and businesses are
created and that individualism is expressed.
Banking restricted mean less jobs.
No night clubs or entertainment equals less jobs and less wealth.
When the people of a country are consigned to the Glory of the State, the leader or the
God there are no productive activities, and thus poverty ensues. If fact, if all there is is
religious study, the economy will stagnate, just like under communist regimes where
political thought and study was part of the day, so instead of concentrating on making
wealth, wealth was deemed evil and political theory was sacrosanct, so less money was
made.
All the cultural highlights of Western Society is what makes the jobs that drive the luxury
market which pulls along everything else. Steel manufacturing is necessary because there
is demand for appliances and cars and buildings, all demanded by people making more
money to buy nicer things. In America keeping up with the Jones's creates the necessity
for ever expanding commerce.
In the rest of the world keeping up with the Jones's is impossible because the Jones's
have rigged the culture against those struggling to make more money.
and yet total privacy and respect. That is the goal many Americans, and like minded
people around the world are striving for. It is the ultimate, if unstated goal. It is hard,
actually, to be serious while claiming that the fantasy world of a TV sci-fi show is your
goal, and yet Star Trek is the best example of a world vision where peace and harmony
and prosperity exist.
The problems of the world seem intractable, but in fact, a fixed time can be applied to
efforts to lift every country out of poverty. People in rich countries who are worried what
will happen when all the world is rich are really just calling for the continuing poverty of
the rest of the world because they are blinded to the great propensity of humans to
solve all problems. People and States who call for the glorification of specific leaders,
states, languages, cultures, political parties or religions are in fact statists, no matter what
their name for themselves is. They believe that the collective has a right above and
beyond the individual and that individualism itself is detrimental to the survival of the
glorified entity.
Each country and region has separate problems and thus the practical steps at
implementing changes will differ in each. However, development comes at the "cost" of
the elimination of many features of the world's cultures. In strict Muslim cultures there will
always be a lack of jobs and wealth because all of the things which generate jobs and
wealth are prohibited.
If everyone wears the same outfit there is no fashion or model industry. Less retail
becomes less warehouses, less shipping, less packaging, less everything that people could
be gainfully employed at. The diversity of fashion is one way that jobs and businesses are
created and that individualism is expressed.
Banking restricted mean less jobs.
No night clubs or entertainment equals less jobs and less wealth.
When the people of a country are consigned to the Glory of the State, the leader or the
God there are no productive activities, and thus poverty ensues. If fact, if all there is is
religious study, the economy will stagnate, just like under communist regimes where
political thought and study was part of the day, so instead of concentrating on making
wealth, wealth was deemed evil and political theory was sacrosanct, so less money was
made.
All the cultural highlights of Western Society is what makes the jobs that drive the luxury
market which pulls along everything else. Steel manufacturing is necessary because there
is demand for appliances and cars and buildings, all demanded by people making more
money to buy nicer things. In America keeping up with the Jones's creates the necessity
for ever expanding commerce.
In the rest of the world keeping up with the Jones's is impossible because the Jones's
have rigged the culture against those struggling to make more money.
| Jim Hlavac |
| Poltics Re-explained |
